The Heart Attack Grill

November 9, 2006

The Heart Attack Grill. It’s for real.

The Heart Attack Grill is absolutely

committed to creating the world’s

greatest hamburger and french fries.

That’s why we have NO freezers,

NO walk-in coolers, and NO heat lamps.

Absolutely everything is freshly

cut and cooked to order.

That’s why everyone says the Grill’s got

“Taste Worth Dying For®.”

From Kate, at Small Dead Animals, comes yet another tribute to academic stupidity and hubris. From her post, Diversity Of Michigan:

The President of Michigan University is taking a stand, one day after the state’s voters approved Proposal 2, a Constitutional amendment banning affirmative action programs…

President Mary Sue Coleman vows to devote her efforts to finding a way around the ban. In a statement that has a promising second career as a college drinking game, the word “diversity” appears 21 times

The words “merit”, “achievement”, and “academic standards” do not make an appearance. [emp-SC&A]

As usual, the SDA comments are superb:

Yoop says

Being a Michigander since about the time the last glacier retreated, I understand a small bit of the politics and the academics of this state. Believe me, the residents of the Great State of Michigan and the alumni of U of M and MSU will get the attention of Ms. Mary Sue Coleman, and those who concur with her thoughts.

One thing the Universities are beginning to take note of (in a State with significant budgetary problems, high unemployment, and a high rate of job loss) is anything that effects their bottom line. Their devout attention is immediately gained at any mention of a decline in State funding or alumni giving.

Gov. Granholm has been handed some restrictions in Tuesday’s voting that will definitely effect what funds she can raid to play the shell game of now-you-see-it,now-you-don’t dollars (refer to Mi Prop 1). The game could begin to get a bit more dicey for some of the State’s institutions of higher learning.

Ms. Coleman works for the citizens of Michigan; the citizens of Michigan have spoken. I’m pretty sure someone will remind her of that rather soon.

I’m guessing that Ms. Coleman’s defiant stand is a dog that won’t hunt.

Richard Ball notes,

If there is diversity when it comes to admissions, why not diversity when it comes to degrees? One degree if you came based on merit, another if you came based on diversity criteria. We could colour-code the degrees, and have a rainbow of them! Wouldn’t that be the ultimate expression of a commitment to diversity?

Richfisher says

WOW ! Imagine getting to vote on something so holy to the utopians like Mary Sue!

As somone who was affected by affirmative action way back when I applied to the Ministry of Natural Resources for employment fresh out of school, and also worked a few summer terms for the “crown” and presently privately contracted with them, I’ve seen the effects of this policy.

I would appreciate the opportunity to actually have a say on the existence of affirmative action.

However I find it difficult to imagine Ontario, or even Canada, ever being so “free” in my lifetime.

rabbit says

Here’s what President Mary Sue Coleman says about changing the admission standards part way through the year:

It would be unfair and wrong for us to review students’ applications using two sets of criteria

By George, I think she’s got it!
canuck in MI says

This is not surprising. Ann Arbor is a bastion of wonderful liberal ideas. I have lived in Michigan for almost 4 years now and have gained some perspective on the place.Although U of M elicits a lot of respect for some of its academic programs and its football team, the mere mention of Ann Arbor is usually received with rolling eyes here.

More great comments over at Kate’s.

Recently, The Anchoress wrote about American culture. Her post, What Is American Culture? is a not so subtle inquiry into an important facet of the American experience- good humor. Americans are more than willing to laugh at themselves and their foibles- and more importantly, we derive great pleasure in doing just that and learning from the experience. That said, there is much more to being an American, of course.

Europeans derisively say America has no culture. They point to their own history, art, and literature as examples of their ‘refined’ sense of culture. Certainly, they have reason to be proud of the cultural achievements of their cultural icons.

Nevertheless, the Americans idea of cultural identity is very different from the European version. Americans believe their cultural identity is derived from great ideas and not great cheese or great paintings.

This country was founded by those seeking escape and opportunity from those ‘cultured’ nations that oppressed them and denied them them the right to determine their own destiny. Class distinctions, feudal systems and other kinds of ‘cultured’ discrimination kept opportunity from millions. As America opened her arms in a warm welcome, the ‘wretched refuse,’ of European ‘cultured’ nations were finally free to make their dreams come true- and in the process, they built the greatest nation on the face of the earth.

Moliere once noted that ‘The less were are like our ancestors, the less we deserve them.’ 

Have we forgotten who we are and where we came from? Have we forgotten that our greatness as a nation has been derived from the ideas and ideals of those ‘wretched refuse’- and not from European cultural elitism? Why are so many so willing to go back to the house that shunned them and would not allow them to eat at the same table as they? May will say that Europe is no longer influenced by the cultural elites, but that is poppycock. This incarnation of cultural elites like to paint themselves as voices ‘of the people’- and like their communist and Nazi predecessors, dissent and disagreement will not be tolerated.

The idea of the free exchange of ideas is lost on many of our European friends. The free and safe exchange of ideas, at every level of society is as threatening to the European cultural elites now as it was a century ago. Astonishingly, that kind of cultural elitism is somehow attractive to the children and grandchildren of those who sought the freedom on our shores that they were denied for centuries. In this post communist and post Nazi era, there are those for whom those kind of ideologies have become ideals. How tragic that is.

In fact, this new (old) kind of secularism is in fact a rejection of modernity. The new ‘culture’ is calling for a retreat back into the old European culture. There are Americans today for whom the ‘right’ kind of racism, bigotry and religious persecution have once again become acceptable forms of cultural and political expression. Professed Christians, Jews, Americans, Israelis, the Danes, the Dutch and a host of others are all castigated for their insistence that they be allowed to be who they are, without fear. The struggle is now against modernity- the idea that all peoples can be equal. Once again, the ‘cultural elites’ decide who is and isn’t worthy of existence. That is not an exaggeration. Ask the Jews under siege in Europe.

Modernity has impacted politics, economics and culture- and that is why the ‘cultural elites’ are so frightened. Modernity equals the playing field. The notion that the ideas of anyone, anywhere, are equal is a direct and deadly challenge to those ‘cultural elites.’

Modernity is an evolution- that is, what has advanced will not be reversed. The cultural secularism of the elites however, is just another ideology- and like ideologies everywhere, secularists can change the rules midstream, if it they so desire, if change serves their needs.

The real expression of democracy and freedom means that secularists and cultural elites will have ceded their control and dominion of what defines culture- and thus, moral authority-  to modernists. To a modernist, the free and open exchange of thoughts and ideas among equals, is the lifeblood of the future.

To the cultural elites, that idea is intolerable. It is no mistake that violence and/or the approval of violence has been accepted by secularists as a legitimate political and cultural expression. To free societies, unmitigated violence is antithetical to our values, morals and principles. Democracies do not settle differences with violence. The cultural elites have no problem with violence or condoning violence, because they understand that they do not have to face equal or violent consequences of their actions. The mistakenly believe that ‘empowers’ them. In fact, the differences between American and European cultures is a different kind of ‘Clash of Civilizations.’ Modernity favors real democracy and real democracy is a threat to cultural elitism.

The European cultural elitists, like cultural and religious elitists everywhere, attempt to place the blame for all their woes elsewhere- on the influences of America, Israel, Jews and Christians. It is not so ironic that group are today’s ‘wretched refuse’ that have built great nations and it is not surprising that their are so many that want to destroy them, because in doing so, they believe they can reassert their elitism and dominance. With threats, guns and bombs, they believe that their own failures and prejudices can be hidden or obscured.

As we have noted, American culture can be defined by our ideas and not by our cheese or puddings.

Americans believe that it is by being best of who we are, that we can do the best we can do. In other words, as a nation, we are better defined by our character than by our cheese.

This nation, built by the beloved ‘wretched refuse’ from the four corners of the earth, has taught us that our collective culture lies in our desire to excel as individuals and as citizens of this great country. Our greatest achievements as a nation came about after we came to understand that we were all cultural elites.

That is why America is the world’s preferred destination for immigrants and ‘wretched refuse’ the world over.