Mercurial Truth? “Where are the Democrats now? Where is the MSM?” Or, “Where Has All The Fraud Gone?”
November 10, 2006
Where are the Democrats now? Where is the MSM?
We were told that there was massive voter fraud and massive voter intimidation in these midterm elections. We were told there were clear and provable plans to undermine the results of electronic voting machines. We were told that thousands of lawyers were ready to go to court, with irrefutable proof of GOP malfeasance.
When are the congressional hearings to take place? Where are the investigative reports generated by the MSM?
The ever touching himself Glenn Greenwald is outraged that Bush ‘lied’ when he said that he had no intention of replacing Donald Rumsfeld as Secretary of Defense, prior to the elections. It seems the over excited Greenwald is unwilling to make the connection that maybe the Democrat Party deliberately lied when they made the allegations of voter fraud. Indeed, if those allegations were true, the Dems would be foolish to toss them- after all, how often is it that you can indict your opposition so clearly and defend the integrity of the election process?
What did Greenwald have to say about the DNC advising their supporters to claim fraud when there was none?
Election fraud is a terrible thing. It’s up to the Democrats to publicly follow through and prove their their allegations, right Glenn?
After all, the Democrats making those claim care about the truth and the welfare of our nation, right Glenn?
(We wonder how long it will take to have the TB to this post removed, this time. No doubt it will be another ‘electronic glitch.’)
November 10, 2006 at 12:26 PM
We were told that there was massive voter fraud and massive voter intimidation in these midterm elections. We were told there were clear and provable plans to undermine the results of electronic voting machines. We were told that thousands of lawyers were ready to go to court, with irrefutable proof of GOP malfeasance.
When are the congressional hearings to take place? Where are the investigative reports generated by the MSM?
doubleplusungood refs unevents.
doubleplusungood refs unpersons.
memhole.
ees party line, comrades.
November 12, 2006 at 9:24 AM
[...] If Glenn Greenwald took some time to read the Carnival Of The Insanities, he might reconsider obsessing about referring to the President as a liar. [...]
November 18, 2006 at 3:07 PM
Of course if you know of a backdoor to a nelection. Removal would prevent use in your favor.
December 2, 2006 at 12:43 PM
Just because the dems won, doesn’t mean there wasn’t fraud. Without fraud, the Democratic margins would have been bigger. Myself and many pople I know encountered fraud directly in Ohio. I only managed to vote through much determination and many wasted hours.
Alan didn’t request a recount because his sampling canvas of votes showed that Webb’s lead would grow substantially with a recount. In Florida, an analysis of 18,000 “missed” votes makes it it clear that Democrat Christine Jennings would have won. There are also strong indications of fraud in Pennsylvania and Montana.
Certainly fraud wasn’t universal, but it was still prevalent enough to raise major concerns. Now that we have a Congress willing to investigate, maybe the full story will have a chance to see the light of day.
December 2, 2006 at 6:57 PM
Your remarks are interesting, but irrelevant and designed to obfuscate the truth
If the Dems could prove fraud, or a pattern of fraud, they are morally bound to do so. Why don’t the 35,000 fraudulent Acorn registrations on your radar, for starters?
As for Congress investigating fraud, I hope you are right. The vast majority of documented- not simply alleged- fraud in the last presidential election was on the part of Dems and their supporters.