Nifong, Boxer, Bridges And Boys
January 13, 2007
Mike Nifong has recused himself from the Duke rape case.
More than likely, he will begin to prepare his campaign as a candidate for election to Congress. It is clear to all North Carolinians his behavior and ethical violations as the Durham District Attorney have more than qualifed him as their representative in Washington, DC.
It is just as clear that many North Carolinia voters that will overlook the fact that he has not yet driven off a bridge and killed anyone.
All in all, there has been some good news, thank Allah.
Barbara Boxer’s ‘Freudian Slip’ is telling. First, she accused Condaleeza Rice as being a flawed decision maker. Then Ms Boxer insinuated that because she has no children, Condaleeza Rice cannot be as empathetic or sympathetic to those Americans who might lose a loved one.
Of course, that would mean Ms Boxer could possibly understand the evil or significance of racism, because she isn’t black and thus her positions on race cannot be taken seriously.
Ms Boxer can opine on with some credibility on the matter of corruption. Among other things, she funneled $115,000 to Douglas Boxer & Associates, from a PAC for Change, her leadership political action committee.
Douglas Boxer calls the Senator, ‘Mommy.‘

January 13, 2007 at 9:09 am
If Nifong lived in NJ and ran as a Democrat, he’d get elected - and he’d fit right in.
January 13, 2007 at 10:31 am
Buzzkill writes: I listened to the interview posted on pajamas media homepage. You are much older than I thought. And santy has a weird lisp. What a twisted hatefilled freak she is…
By “much older” you clearly mean “more mature”. As for a “weird lisp” are you suggesting that I am gay? LOL Buzz, sad to say, it is clear to anyone who reads what you write, that you are the hatefilled freak. Are you even capable of a rational argument, or can you only spew forth invective at anyone you disagree with and who see through your veneer of make-believe superiority to the frightened, angry person beneath .
January 13, 2007 at 9:04 pm
Are you denying you made those remarks on Eteraz?
Are so willing to be proved a liar?
Are you denying you made similar remarks on here and on other blogs?
Are you denying you have made similar remarks under assumed names?
January 14, 2007 at 8:25 am
Wow, Buzz, get a life.
I’m not paving any new road here, but any republican senator or congressman making these statements would be crucified.
Thanks, Siggy, Dr. Sanity, Neo-neocon and others for providing welcome clarity and providing us non-practitioners with some understanding of how the moonbat mind works.
January 14, 2007 at 12:01 pm
Buzz, Dr Sanity- and other bloggers- are right.
You really are too dysfunctional to deal with. Time for you to go.
January 14, 2007 at 12:36 pm
Remember this?
How about this?
Then there was this exchange. Do you recall that?
More to follow.
Here you are, talking about morality.
Your choice of words is interesting.
By the way, wanna talk about how Cheney Rumsfeld and some Jews were responsbile for 9/11?
Maybe it’s time to do a little homework, Buzz.
Know what I mean? Sure you do!