*UPDATED* Another Cow Put Out To Pasture: Cindy Sheehan’s Last Dance
May 29, 2007
Cindy Sheehan has left the antiwar movement. In a farewell letter posted at the Daily Kos, Sheehan commits her final act of ‘shahada,’ martyrdom, by blaming the left, the right and little green men for her predicament. Her rambling, pointless screed is as meaningful as the suicide bomber’s goodbye videotape- and just as effective. No one, other than other dysfunctional misfits out of touch with reality that share her kind of psychopathy, will see her as credible.
Sheehan blurs reality with unreality.
…Especially since I renounced any tie I have remaining with the Democratic Party, I have been further trashed on such “liberal blogs” as the Democratic Underground. Being called an “attention whore” and being told “good riddance” are some of the more milder rebukes…
I was the darling of the so-called left as long as I limited my protests to George Bush and the Republican Party. Of course, I was slandered and libeled by the right as a “tool” of the Democratic Party. This label was to marginalize me and my message. How could a woman have an original thought, or be working outside of our “two-party” system?
…However, when I started to hold the Democratic Party to the same standards that I held the Republican Party, support for my cause started to erode and the “left” started labeling me with the same slurs that the right used. I guess no one paid attention to me when I said that the issue of peace and people dying for no reason is not a matter of “right or left”, but “right and wrong.”
Yeah, that was Sheehan’s real problem- persecution and misogyny.
Her travails are the result of persecution by the Republicans or Democrats. For some strange reason, Sheehan won’t discuss the financial mismanagement that may well lead to state investigations. Apparently, there are some peace activists that are upset at how money was being spent- and made to disappear.
Sara L. Oliver, who left the group in 2005 following a dispute surrounding her efforts to secure grant funding for the organization, and other disaffected members have gone public with their suspicions and accusations against the Peace House, calling for an official investigation into why the group only has $14,700 in its bank account. Tens of thousands in donations, collected during Sheehan’s 2005 anti-war protest at the Crawford site, are unaccounted for, Oliver claims…
Another ex-member, Sandra Row, said she had seen buckets of cash donations in the Peace House in 2005. Some of that money, she said, had been used to pay veterinary bills for a cat living on the property, but many of those who bought supplies for the demonstrators were never compensated. As many as 75 people have quit the group because of grievances over financial matters.
“You’ll never know how much money there is because the cash is gone,” Row said…
The delinquent tax report is also to be filed next week, Wolf said. Because it was not filed in time, Peace House lost its corporate charter – a mistake seized upon by Oliver who filed for the legal right to control the name with the Texas Comptroller’s Office. Wolf has threatened legal action, saying the Crawford Peace House still exists as an unincorporated entity and Oliver is violating the law by using the same or similar name of an existing organization.
According to the comptroller’s office, loss of the corporate charter makes the organization’s board members liable for any Peace House debts. Sheehan, who was listed in 2005 as a board member, could be now forced to deal with the organization’s liabilities.
Sheehan’s Crawford Peace Camp money troubles might be the tip of the iceberg. She is trying to sell the five acres of land used by the antiwar movement in Crawford, Texas.
Camp Casey has served its purpose. It’s for sale. Anyone want to buy five beautiful acres in Crawford , Texas ? I will consider any reasonable offer.
Camp Crawford may not be Cindy Sheehan’s to sell, if it was purchased by the ‘movement’. Sheehan seems to care little about the law. She has also stated she will not pay her taxes. Given all the financial irregularities, it should come as no surprise. She probably doesn’t have any money left, anyway, and even if she did, her track record handling money is unimpressive. Despite the hundreds of thousands of dollars she has been paid (if not millions) and the insurance money paid out to her by the army, Sheehan’s beloved Casey went without a grave marker for a very long time. She had time to build a photogenic and dramatic phony cemetery in Crawford, Texas but no time to take care of her son. The decent citizens who did provide for Casey Sheehan’s last rites and care were screwed by Sheehan, too.
Somewhere in the midst of the carnival, Cindy Sheehan became less of a grieving mother and more of a willing pawn, only too happy to have the spotlight shine on her. Cindy Sheehan became the American Palestinian, for whom truth was irrelevant. The object of the game was to stay in the headlines and be perceived as a victim, even if that environment had to be created.
We will repeat, one more time, what you have heard a hundred times.
Cindy Sheehan is grieving over her son, Casey, who was killed in Iraq at the young age of 24. Many Americans- but not all- extend their sympathy to Mrs. Sheehan and the other mothers that have made similar sacrifices.
You see, some Americans, like Cindy Sheehan and her coterie of hangers on, losers and misfits, are very selective as to whom they extend their goodwill. If you don’t share their politics, you can go to hell, and may you and yours suffer and rot away. The hypocrisy is stunning. Unless you support their agenda, you and your dead son deserve no sympathy. In fact, you can be derided and ridiculed.
That is not an overstatement. In referring to parents who have lost loved in in Oraq but do not share Sheehan’s views, she says,
“I am starting to lose a little compassion for them. I know they have been as brainwashed as the rest of America…
I have been silent on the Gold Star Moms who still support [President Bush] and his war by saying that they deserve the right to their opinions because they are in as much pain as I am. I would challenge them, though, at this point to start thinking for themselves…
Hallie Lord wrote in an online message board:
The fact that some of us mothers vehemently disagree with you does not mean that we have been brainwashed. We are perfectly capable of thinking for ourselves and forming intelligent opinions about this war…The more you belittle others the less likely they are to hear and respond to your message.” “What an elitist, arrogant [remark],”
And so it goes. There is no disagreement, there is no room for tolerance or dissent. Disagree and you are labeled a fool, or brainwashed.
To be clear- if Ms. Sheehan were to have adopted a real anti war stance, we would have applauded- and even celebrated, her right to protest the war. While we can respect Cindy Sheehan the mother, we cannot abide Cindy Sheehan, ‘political activist.’
Ms. Sheehan is no more sympathetic a figure than any other mother who has suffered a loss and in fact, she may be less deserving. Instead of legitimately opposing the war, as is her right, Ms. Sheehan has made a deliberate choice to misrepresent her agenda. Ms. Sheehan has made a deliberate choice. She has chosen to align herself with those who have a particular political agenda, as we have noted, and she has allowed the death of her son to be used to camouflage those actions and that agenda.
It is not a principled anti war stand, in the least. Cindy Sheehan and company are asking us to leave Iraq now- right now, and the consequences be damned. Of course, that in fact would most resemble what happened after we left Vietnam. Jane Fonda’s ‘heroes’ swarmed into the south, killed almost a million people and kept ‘re-education camps’ populated for decades. That is what Cindy Sheehan and her supporters are asking us to do now- to turn Iraq over to the ‘freedom fighters’ Ms Sheehan and her supporters speak so highly of.
Apparently, some lives are worth less than others.
It is notable that whenever the Vietnam debacle is alluded to, as of often the case in attempting to make comparisons to the current conflict, no one ever mentions that it was Presidents Kennedy and Johnson that foisted that war upon the country- Democrats. No one today ever refers to those Presidents as ‘Hitler.’ When you consider that over 57,000 Americans died in that war, we find the lack of outrage curious, though not at all surprising. It is also interesting to recognize that President Johnson, who signed the Civil Rights Act, is not credited for wanting to keep South Vietnam free and democratic. After all, a free and democratic society is what leftists abhor and fear most. Hugo Chavez tramples on his critics, on free speech and a free press and the leftists are for the most part silent. Chavez can do what they can only dream of doing. As we have noted, Utopia cannot be imposed without tyranny.
It is clear that Cindy Sheehan is irrelevant. Everything she now claims to stand for and with, is irrelevant, because it is predicated on barely veiled deceit. She has made her choice and she will now have to live with that deliberately chosen deceit, surrounded by people who live by and worship deceit. In due course, she will be abandoned and forgotten, replaced with another, more photogenic icon. She will be relegated to a trivia blip in the real world and will have earned an irrelevant immortality in the politically correct next generation of junior high school history textbooks. As a mother who lost a son in war, she will always have our sympathy. As a political activist, she has earned our contempt.
Cindy Sheehan’s most important accomplices haven’t been the professional political activists, deliberately posing as anti war protestors, hiding the funding and their agenda.
That distinction belongs to the media, barely able to contain itself. The media won’t tell you that David Duke and Stormfront, the neo Nazis have aligned themselves with Sheehan. They won’t tell you that Sheehan and her supporters have not distanced themselves from those people. If the cause is worthy, we suppose, much can be ignored. They won’t tell you just how orchestrated this ‘grass roots’ movement really is. For more insight on the Cindy Sheehan circus, read The Media Force Field, from the The Anchoress.
This unholy alliance of deceit is one of the greatest cons since the pairing of Paul Newman and Robert Redford in The Sting, with one exception. That great film was about a fictional con job. Today, the con job is a real one, designed to separate us from the truth and tear it up in the process.
Behind the scenes, machinations are contrived and hatched at a frenzied pace. Say anything, do anything, that pushes the sacred agenda. Welcome to the real world of Cindy Sheehan’s principled world of honesty and integrity.
In Georgia, Cynthia McKinney writes an open letter, insisting that Mr. Bush meet with Cindy Sheehan, in the interest of ‘fairness’ and ‘decency.’ This is the same Cynthia McKinney that refused to vote on a congressional resolution condemning the vile and racist anti-Semitic speeches of Louis Farrakhan disciple, Khalid Muhammad. McKinney saw the vote as a threat to freedom of speech and expression. Apparently, ‘fairness’ and ‘decency’ are relative. You can ignore those calls if you stand behind a racist and a bigot like Khalid Mohammed.
Ms. McKinney was the only American delegate that refused to walk out the Durban conference, of the ‘Zionism is Racism’ fame. This is notable because Ms McKinney sat on the House Armed Services Committee and the House International Relations Committee.
We suppose Ms. Sheehan is willing to overlook McKinney’s track record of hate because of her virulently anti American credentials- the kind that suit Cindy Sheeham and her supporters just fine.
When McKinney lost her seat in the House in 2002, many Democrats breathed a sigh of relief. She openly attributed her loss to ‘the Jews’ among others. When she was reelected, she was hailed as a conquering hero- mostly because she could be counted on as an anti Bush vote.
Someone needs to remind Cindy Sheehan that you are known by the company you keep.
Her open embrace of Hugo Chavez says more about her and those that support her, than it does about Chavez. As that tinpot dictator shuts down media outlets that disagree with his policies- which really means they are holding him accountable and demand transparency- Sheehan’s orchestrated public appearances have made her agenda clear.
See the Anchoress Stunning Media Spin On Chavez and Choosing Liberty for a no rose colored look at the reality of what the likes of Cindy Sheehan and the company she kept, really stand for.
She also needs to be reminded that her son, Casey, too, will be remembered by the company he kept- some of the finest men and women this nation have to offer. Despite all her efforts to the contrary, Cindy Sheehan will be unable to change the legacy of her son Casey, despite the cynical use of her own son’s memory. He will best be remembered by a grateful nation for having given his life in the defense of freedom.
Cindy Sheehan has been abandoned and tossed into the refuse heap. We can think of no more fitting tribute. Those who exploited her and those that have supported her will follow along, shortly.
*UPDATE* The shortest distance between two lines is a straight point. See the Anchoress post, Sheehan’s Usefulness Played Out, She’s Gone:
…she realizes – finally – that the Democrats and the left only loved her as long as she was doing their bidding emotion-tapping, Bush-bashing, Jackson-hugging, insurgent-encouraging, Chavez-hugging, camera-mugging, headline-grabbing, mob-collecting tool of distraction and obfuscation thing, meant to drive down the president’s poll numbers and support for his efforts to keep terrorist attacks from our shores.
When you see that, in black and white, the Sheehan side show can be seen exactly for what it was- a side show. The media cannot bring themselves to honestly report on Sheehan and her clear denunciation of the left. Saint Cindy was canonized by the media, after all. To be honest now would only highlight their own deceit.
Still, the Anchoress provides moral clarity in addition to the play by play:
Madam, your gracious and courageous son – whose death is tragic and for whom your mourning is nothing less than appropriate – will only have died “for nothing” if his mission is left dangling and unfinished by the very people – and their minions – who exploited you and who help to make the job of every soldier in Iraq more difficult. Your son died fighting – like the very noblest and most formidable of heroes – to free a people and a nation from tyranny, and to rid them of the nests of violent and murderous men who keep their nation – and a whole region – under the boot, under the veil and out of the marketplace of ideas and invention, progress and parity. So long as those people are so subjected, the “world peace” you rant for will never take hold, and terrorism – the killing and maiming of utter innocents – will continue, throughout the world, to be the preferred means of movement.
What is most noteworthy is what the Anchoress leaves almost unsaid.
She forgives Cindy Sheehan, for causing her and millions of others, great pain. She does not ask or demand we do the same. If we can find it in our hearts to forgive Sheehan, so much the better. If there are those among us that cannot find forgiveness, so be it. She talks to Sheehan but addresses us, too, with a certain truth.
In real life, conflict and disagreement are inevitable, even among those we love most. The problem is not the conflict- the real measure of our humanity is how we choose to deal with the conflict.
Do go home, Ma’am. Do go home and be silent for a little while, because silence is so much more instructive than noise… Your son had already figured it out. He knew liberty comes through the overthrow of tyrants.
Cindy Sheehan has much to consider. So do we. We can be as divisive as Sheehan or we can be healing, even when we disagree.
May 29, 2007 at 11:18 AM
Did Holy Mother Sheehan’s martyr/son ever get his gravestone?
May 29, 2007 at 11:27 AM
The fact that McKinney even raised her voice in Sheehan’s behalf is the last nail in both their coffins.
May 29, 2007 at 11:37 AM
[...] Carl and Alfred (SC & A) weighs in with their well written view of Cindy S’s exit here. Swap This These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new [...]
May 29, 2007 at 1:37 PM
Excellent essay on an unworhty subject.
When Cindy Sheehan first came into the public scene I actually used to pity her. Just from looking at her I felt that she was a distraught woman who was not in her right mind and who was being used.
A few months (weeks? days?) later I simply couldn’t stand her. The endless whining, the sloppy demeanor (please buy a blouse that fits, Cindy, and throw out the t-shirt. Pink is Not Your Color), the stupidity coming out of her mouth, the outright anti-Americanism when embracing Chavez – and it went on and on and on.
Let’s hope she really really means it, and will stay away from the public scene.
May 29, 2007 at 3:05 PM
Cindy began as simply a rather unstable mother who had lost a son. She was quickly seen as a useful tool for badgering Bush and the GOP.
But there were bad omens right from the start; she sometimes also spoke ill of a Democrat. So it was certain her financial base would ebb away.
When campaigns heat up and the money flows, activists enlist. Who wants to sit unnoticed snd unfunded in Crawford TX?
She spoke of the Democrats in her farewell. I bet that part isn’t mentioned much in the media.
May 29, 2007 at 5:56 PM
[...] Siggy is not quite so compassionate. [...]
May 29, 2007 at 6:05 PM
Comrade Sheehan has outlived her usefulness to The Party. She has been Purged.
She spoke of the Democrats in her farewell. I bet that part isn’t mentioned much in the media.
doubleplusungood refs unevents.
doubleplusungood refs unpersons.
memhole.
May 29, 2007 at 6:48 PM
I am very happy that Cindy came into the public view, as we all should be. Due to the traitorous media blackout of honorable actions by our armed forces we would never have known the words and deeds of her brave and noble son “I go where my chief goes” and of his sacrifice, if not for her shenanigans. She is a pathetic human being but she did bring Sgt. Casey Sheehan into the world, and we are better off because of it, because of HIM. Don’t forget him.
May 29, 2007 at 9:45 PM
SC&A:
“Cindy Sheehan is grieving over her son, Casey, who was killed in Iraq at the young age of 24″
Y’know, I remember her saying how surprised she was that Casey had joined the Army.
Casey Sheehan was a Catholic altar boy AND an Eagle Scout growing up…both are activities where boys are in uniform, and under the authority of uniformed men.
Did she even KNOW her own son?
With a background like that, I’d have been surprised if he HADN’T joined the service.
From where I sit, it wasn’t Bush she was angry at, but her son.
She transferred that anger to the President, and that not uncommon trait became subsidized by breathtakngly cynical carpetbaggers until her usefulness was at an end.
I read excerpts from her screed.
If this is not the country that she loves, then she is under no obligation whatsoever to remain among us.
But Casey Sheehan’s grave SHALL remain here.
He’s a hero to many of us around these parts.
I don’t think he died for nothing.
Too bad for her that she thinks he did.
Regards;
May 29, 2007 at 11:23 PM
I don’t think I always agreed with Cindy Sheehan, but her ‘resignation’ struck a chord with me
because I think we have both been asking ourselves many of the same questions during the last six
years.
Six years ago, I believed most of what I had been taught in High School: that even though we were
a country with problems, we were a basically fair country that was trying to do good in the world and
we were making progress in becoming a better one. I thought that somehow our traditions and morality would
endure, no matter what the test.
Then came Bush and the supreme court decision that made him president. I was surprised and
disillusioned by how little resistance there was to this power grab.
People, with the exception of a few stuffed shirt professorial types, seemed perfectly content
to go on with life, chewing their cuds, and shopping at WalMart. Our politicians and news media
told us to get over it and move on. And I realized that what I’d been taught in school about how
America would stand up to anything remotely approaching tyranny was wrong, very wrong.
Next came the war. Sold to us like a bad used car using every advertising technique
on the books. I noticed that our “fair and balanced” media handled the “debate” on Iraq by ignoring
the few voices that spoke out against it and giving first place to those who promoted it. I remember
seeing one old Colonel Blimp type on Fox News after another proclaiming what a glorious Schlagfest
the war would be. A chance for all of us to shed a few patriotic crocodile tears with an aside
once in a while about the number of hapless Iraqi draftees we’d “shake and baked” so that we wouldn’t
lose more than a couple of hundred of our own. What faith I had in the ability of the American
people to see through phonies disappeared.
This was confirmed by the 2004 election. I knew Bush was going to win again. I’d been out in
the streets registering voters for the Democratic Party and I’d been told regurgitated Bush talking
points often enough to know that most people were still buying what he was selling.
But I still believed that the Democratic Party was our last and only hope to stop the madness. And
that there were a few leaders willing to take risks and stand up for what was right no matter what
the cost.
Then, shortly before the election last fall, our “brave” Democratic leaders went AWOL when Bush
decided it was time to remove the last vestiges of legal rights the Guantanamo detainees had. In
the interest of appearing “strong on terrorism” they voted to take away Habeas Corpus, a fundamental fairness,
I had been told in my high school history class, that everyone deserved no matter what they were alleged to have
done and what their background was.
As usual, this issue disappeared into the bowels of our American shopping malls as far as the American People
were concerned.
But, I still thought we were simply deceived and that eventually we would wake up.
Then I went to the funeral of a BlackWater employee who had been the cousin of my father-in-law.
After listening to speech after speech eulogizing the activities of someone who had basically been
a mercenary, after seeing the third fly-over of the grave, after hearing the governor’s
proclamation ordering flags at half mast and after seeing the honor guards and listening to the
awe-struck comments of the attendees, I realized that we love war. For us it is the ultimate
football game and we worshipped this man for all the blood he had shed.
We are not just an ignorant and stupid and selfish people. We are a blood-thirsty one that
loves nothing better than beating up a 98 pound weakling like a nation with a hundredth of our
resources.
We are turning on the Iraq war now, not because we see any wrong in grabbing a country
for its oil, but because the war is not working.
We are mad at Bush, not because he is a murdering thug, but he is an *incompetent* murdering
thug.
I too, like Cindy, am profoundly disillusioned with this America. I too, have been forced to go
home to friends and family to find an America I can love and respect. I wish her luck. Perhaps
we can both find what we are looking for.
May 30, 2007 at 9:00 AM
wgweis, why are you spreading your personal delusions in comment boxes across the internet?
I’m embarrassed for you.
The America you claim to love never existed. It’s all part of your liberal delusions on what you want to turn America into.
Go to Canada.
May 30, 2007 at 9:17 AM
wgweis: “Then came Bush and the supreme court decision that made him president.”
What evidence do you have of that? Both the NYT and WaPo declared Mr Bush the winner of the 2000 election after they conducted their own counts.
Further, if there was so much electoral cheating on the part of the GOP, did they just decide to ‘throw’ the last congressional election? And why does most of the actual DOCUMENTED electoral fraud favor the Democrats?
At least tell the truth. Starting out with a lie means one of two things. Either you are ignorant or deliberately intend to deceive. In either case, your opinions are irrelevant. Simply having an opinion does not make that opinion equal to all others.
Then you say, “Next came the war. Sold to us like a bad used car using every advertising technique
on the books. ”
Actually, we went to war because Bill Clinton told the truth!
See this:
http://sigcarlfred.blogspot.com/2005/11/we-went-to-war-because-bill-clinton.html
If you are going to pretend to be so hurt and offended, at least be aware of reality.
Lastly, you say, “We are not just an ignorant and stupid and selfish people. We are a blood-thirsty one that
loves nothing better than beating up a 98 pound weakling like a nation with a hundredth of our
resources.”
Actually, this is where you expose yourself for the fraud and phony you are.
Those supported by the left are some of the most evil and dysfunctional people in the world. They have been responsible for more death, famine, genocide and hopelessness in the history of mankind.
You are a fraud and a hypocrite. You have no idea what ignorant, stupid, selfish and blood-thirsty really look like.
Might I suggest you look in the mirror.
May 30, 2007 at 11:04 PM
wgweis:
“I too, like Cindy, am profoundly disillusioned with this America. I too, have been forced to go
home to friends and family to find an America I can love and respect. I wish her luck. Perhaps
we can both find what we are looking for.”
No…no…NO!
(Took too long for the DailyKos 1200+ comment thread to load on yer dial-up, huh?)
This doesn’t work in print at ALL!
There’s no pathos in the print.
You need to go wrap your nugget in Rosie O’Donnell’s “Headscarf of Misery”, get a schoolmarm-ish looking woman to sit next to you and glare at the camera while you bleat your screed into YouTube.
THAT’S entertainment!
May 31, 2007 at 11:23 AM
Wgweis is afflicted with a common ailment – a delusional belief that s/he “sees the truth” while the rest of us fools stand around “chewing our cud”.
Nothing of that post represents original thinking, and the supreme irony of the stupid lecturing the thoughtful has lost it’s appeal for me. Bilgeman has given good advice, wgweis….peddle your wares on YouTube where you can engage in maximum self-indulgence without bothering others.
May 31, 2007 at 11:49 PM
anniebird:
“Bilgeman has given good advice, wgweis”
Awww, shoot. Now I have to Paypal SC&A the “House Cut of the Action”.
Regards;
May 31, 2007 at 11:56 PM
Hey wgweis:
” And I realized that what I’d been taught in school about how
America would stand up to anything remotely approaching tyranny was wrong, very wrong.”
Do you remember being taught anything at all about the Electoral College?
(Here’s a hint: It was taught in Civics or Government classes).
Hit the books again, harder, you mouth-breathing dirt-merchant.