The Educational Gulag?
October 31, 2007
NEWARK, Del., October 30, 2007—The University of Delaware subjects students in its residence halls to a shocking program of ideological reeducation that is referred to in the university’s own materials as a “treatment” for students’ incorrect attitudes and beliefs. The Orwellian program requires the approximately 7,000 students in Delaware’s residence halls to adopt highly specific university-approved views on issues ranging from politics to race, sexuality, sociology, moral philosophy, and environmentalism. The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) is calling for the total dismantling of the program, which is a flagrant violation of students’ rights to freedom of conscience and freedom from compelled speech.
“The University of Delaware’s residence life education program is a grave intrusion into students’ private beliefs,” FIRE President Greg Lukianoff said. “The university has decided that it is not enough to expose its students to the values it considers important; instead, it must coerce its students into accepting those values as their own. At a public university like Delaware, this is both unconscionable and unconstitutional.”
The university’s views are forced on students through a comprehensive manipulation of the residence hall environment, from mandatory training sessions to “sustainability” door decorations. Students living in the university’s eight housing complexes are required to attend training sessions, floor meetings, and one-on-one meetings with their Resident Assistants (RAs). The RAs who facilitate these meetings have received their own intensive training from the university, including a “diversity facilitation training” session at which RAs were taught, among other things, that “[a] racist is one who is both privileged and socialized on the basis of race by a white supremacist (racist) system. The term applies to all white people (i.e., people of European descent) living in the United States, regardless of class, gender, religion, culture or sexuality.”
The university suggests that at one-on-one sessions with students, RAs should ask intrusive personal questions such as “When did you discover your sexual identity?” Students who express discomfort with this type of questioning often meet with disapproval from their RAs, who write reports on these one-on-one sessions and deliver these reports to their superiors. One student identified in a write-up as an RA’s “worst” one-on-one session was a young woman who stated that she was tired of having “diversity shoved down her throat.”
According to the program’s materials, the goal of the residence life education program is for students in the university’s residence halls to achieve certain “competencies” that the university has decreed its students must develop in order to achieve the overall educational goal of “citizenship.” These competencies include: “Students will recognize that systemic oppression exists in our society,” “Students will recognize the benefits of dismantling systems of oppression,” and “Students will be able to utilize their knowledge of sustainability to change their daily habits and consumer mentality.”
At various points in the program, students are also pressured or even required to take actions that outwardly indicate their agreement with the university’s ideology, regardless of their personal beliefs. Such actions include displaying specific door decorations, committing to reduce their ecological footprint by at least 20%, taking action by advocating for an “oppressed” social group, and taking action by advocating for a “sustainable world.”
In the Office of Residence Life’s internal materials, these programs are described using the harrowing language of ideological reeducation. In documents relating to the assessment of student learning, for example, the residence hall lesson plans are referred to as “treatments.”
In a letter sent yesterday to University of Delaware President Patrick Harker, FIRE pointed out the stark contradiction between the residence life education program and the values of a free society. FIRE’s letter to President Harker also underscored the University of Delaware’s legal obligation to abide by the First Amendment. FIRE reminded Harker of the Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette (1943), a case decided during World War II that remains the law of the land. Justice Robert H. Jackson, writing for the Court, declared, “If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein.”
“The fact that the university views its students as patients in need of treatment for some sort of moral sickness betrays a total lack of respect not only for students’ basic rights, but for students themselves,” Lukianoff said. “The University of Delaware has both a legal and a moral obligation to immediately dismantle this program, and FIRE will not rest until it has.”
A mandatory University of Delaware program requires residence hall students to acknowledge that “all whites are racist” and offers them “treatment” for any incorrect attitudes regarding class, gender, religion, culture or sexuality they might hold upon entering the school, according to a civil rights group…
“A RACIST: A racist is one who is both privileged and socialized on the basis of race by a white supremacist (racist) system. ‘The term applies to all white people (i.e., people of European descent) living in the United States, regardless of class, gender, religion, culture or sexuality. By this definition, people of color cannot be racists, because as peoples within the U.S. system, they do not have the power to back up their prejudices, hostilities, or acts of discrimination….’”
The education program also notes that “reverse racism” is “a term created and used by white people to deny their white privilege.” And “a non-racist” is called “a non-term,” because, the program explains, “The term was created by whites to deny responsibility for systemic racism, to maintain an aura of innocence in the face of racial oppression, and to shift the responsibility for that oppression from whites to people of color (called ‘blaming the victim’)…”
“Such utter contempt for the autonomy and free agency of others is the hallmark of totalitarianism and has no place in any free society, let alone at a public university in the state of Delaware,” the letter said.
Especially alarming, Harris told WND, is that the school defines learning specifically as “attitudinal or behavioral changes,” not acquiring any sort of knowledge and ability. [emp-- SC&A]
Tonight, at the late hour of 10:00 PM we will be hosting a special podcast on the subjects of education, indoctrination and political ideologies. Joining us will be Dr Sanity and Mamacita, educator extraordinaire and author of Weekly Scheiss. We hope to be able to include others in what is a very necessary airing of ideas and ideals and conversation about the role of education in our society. Listeners will be able to participate in the conversation. The call in number is 347-215-7863.

October 31, 2007 at 7:16 am
[...] Sigmund, Carl and Alfred: "The Educational Gulag." [...]
October 31, 2007 at 8:29 am
It would be interesting to hear what presidential candidate Joe Biden has to say about this. Folks from Delaware, call your senator.
October 31, 2007 at 8:34 am
Beautiful, expat.
October 31, 2007 at 9:14 am
[...] Full story below. Swap This These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]
October 31, 2007 at 1:24 pm
I believe the scientific term for this phenomenon is “Hating Whitey.” It’s a pretty standard (actually required, I think) attitude for Critical Theorists, known to the real world as Social Marxists, or, more simply, Professors. [Q: Why are so many professors Marxists? A: Where else can a Marxist get a job?]
The world exists as a series of Oppressor-Oppressed relationships; the first to notice this was Karl Marx, who observed it of economic conditions in early industrial Western Europe. The problem is that Marxist theories don’t really account for American-style democratic capitalism, where economic class is far less immutable than it was in a Europe still mired in the death throes of the Age of Royalty.
So academics took up the Oppressor-Oppressor theme and applied it to social categories more immutable than economic status, such as race and gender. [The scientific name for the gender-based version is "Are Men Necessary?" a question usually asked by women whom men have apparently concluded are unnecessary.]
If you’re a minority, you’re oppressed. By definition. As long as you remain a member of the minority, you are oppressed, and the rules written by the oppressor don’t strictly apply to you. If your minority is immutable, all the better. You can live your life disregarding society’s rules becaused they were written by the oppressor to keep you down.
It is the perfect justification for every personal failure anybody could ever experience (which is why it is so popular amoung the professoriat, a class largely the manifestation of the simple truth that he who can’t do, teaches).
Find out if the school has this type of reindoctrination program. Don’t go there. Don’t send your kids there. Don’t send your money there. Complain like hell. Education is for imparting knowledge, not changing behavoir. INSIST ON IT whenever you deal with the academic establishment, whether as student, parent or alumni. ONLY YOU CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE.
October 31, 2007 at 7:19 pm
[...] October 31st, 2007 At 10:00 PM we will be hosting a special podcast on the subjects of education, indoctrination and political ideologies (we are responding to the latest debacle/outrage at the University of Delaware. See our post, here). [...]
November 1, 2007 at 9:50 am
[...] In another podcast, we hosted Dr Sanity and Mamacita in a terrific discussion on education, the state of our schools and indoctrination. The podcast was spurred on by the revelation of the University of Delaware’s ‘treatment’ of students with an ‘incorrect’ attitude. See the Educational Gulag? [...]
November 4, 2007 at 5:33 pm
It is long overdue for conservatives to tackle the issue of racism. We advocate a color-blind society. Liberals advocate pandering to racial activist groups.