From The Spectator

“Such is the disgusting and terrifying state to which Britain’s intelligentsia has now descended.”

Today, the Universities and Colleges Union is discussing whether universities should single out Israeli and Jewish scholars for active discrimination.

Yes, you read that correctly. The UCU is debating a motion which not only raises the spectre yet again of an academic boycott of Israel but demands of Jewish and Israeli academics that they explain their politics as a pre-condition to normal academic contact. The motion asks colleagues

to consider the moral and political implications of educational links with Israeli institutions, and to discuss the occupation with individuals and institutions concerned, including Israeli colleagues with whom they are collaborating… the testimonies will be used to promote a wide discussion by colleagues of the appropriateness of continued educational links with Israeli academic institutions… Ariel College, an explicitly colonising institution in the West Bank, be investigated under the formal Greylisting Procedure.

The implication is that, if they don’t condemn Israel for the ‘occupation’, or practising ‘apartheid’, ‘genocide’ or any of the other manufactured crimes laid at Israel’s door by the Palestinian/Islamist/neonazi/leftwing axis, they won’t be able to work. Their continued employment will depend on their holding views which are permitted. The views they are being bludgeoned into expressing as a condition of their employment are based on lies, distortion, propaganda, gross historical ignorance, blood libels and prejudice. And this in the universities, supposedly the custodians of free thought and inquiry in the service of dispassionate scholarship.

What makes it all the more appalling is that it is Israelis and Jews alone who are being singled out for this treatment. No other group is to be barred from academic activity unless they hold ‘approved’ views; no state-run educational institution controlled by any of the world’s numerous tyrannies is to be ‘grey-listed’. The UCU’s own rules state that it

actively opposes all forms of harassment, prejudice and unfair discrimination.

Well, various Jewish groups in the Stop the Boycott campaign have obtained a legal opinion from two QCs which states that today’s motion constitutes harassment, prejudice and unfair discrimination on grounds of race or nationality. It says:

If the Motion is passed it would expose Jewish members of the Union to indirect discrimination… Additionally, the Union faces potential liability for acts of harassment on grounds of race or nationality. The substance of the Motion may also involve the Union in becoming accessories to acts of discrimination in an employment context against Israeli academics…No doubt, if such Israeli academics speak in favour of the Palestinian viewpoint they will be immune from further action; if they are against it or possibly even non-committal they and their institutions are to be considered potentially unsuitable subjects for continued association…

The Union will accordingly be adopting a provision, criterion or practice which will put Jewish members at a particular disadvantage compared to non-Jewish members. That is because Jewish members are much more likely to have links with Israeli academics and institutions than non -Jewish members. To require Jewish members to act consistently with the Motion (if passed) would be to impose a professional detriment upon them as Union members which is based on their race. If they acted inconsistently with the Motion, we infer that they would also be subject to disadvantage or sanction under the Union rules or practices — an alternative detriment. We do not see how any such detriment would be justified as pursuing a legitimate aim. No proper Union purpose is promoted by imposing this detriment on certain members. Thus the Motion will have the effect of indirectly — and unlawfully — against Jewish Members of the Union.

The opinion is thus unequivocal. Today’s motion breaks the law; it breaks the UCU’s own rules; it is prejudiced, discriminatory and unjust towards Israelis and Jews. But the motion also notes

legal attempts to prevent UCU debating boycott of Israeli academic institutions; and legal advice that such debates are lawful

In other words, two fingers to the Jews. Such is the disgusting and terrifying state to which Britain’s intelligentsia has now descended.

3 Responses to “Tally Ho! Witch-Hunt Against The Jews”

  1. Dr. Sanity Says:

    I think this is the perfect example of how we in the West have come to find ourselves besieged by the Islamofascists. The ideological door was opened to the fanatics and terrorists of Islam by the political left whose fascist and oppressive agenda not only excuses terrorism, but actively facilitates it. The jihadists and extremists we fight in Afghanistan, Iraq and elsewhere are really just a symptom of the larger ideological disease, which has been relatively dormant in the West since the defeat of national socialism and later, the supposed “fall” of communism. Neither of these ideologies were really defeated; they simply went underground and formed common cause with the Islamic collectivists. These ideological brethren are now freely coming forward with the same agenda they have always had, but now that agenda is disguised by the multicultural, politically correct, environfacist and pacifascist trimmings the left has used to adorn the basic message. Is it any wonder that they support and embrace the dysfunction and terrorism of the Palestinians and abhor Israel (and the U.S.)? They are very close to victory now, with a potential president of the U.S. in Obama, who believes their message to the core of his being. They have discovered that they don’t need a violent revolution after all–they can simply use democracy and freedom to achieve their ultimate goal–the destruction of both democracy and individual freedom; the subservience of the individual to the state; and the elimination of capitalism as an economic force in the world in favor of the controlled economy. This is what they call “utopia” or the “caliphate”–but it makes no difference what it is called. It is the end of all the values the West once stood for.

    Pretty depressing to see this happening at an accelerated pace in Britain.

  2. Todd Anthony Says:

    I sense a replication in behavior…I’m not a scholar of WWII history, or pre-WWII history, but didn’t Europe, in general, basically sell the Jews out? Aren’t we seeing this again?

    Dr. Sanity, I wrote essentially the same thing on my blog regarding the shameless pandering we have committed just to avoid “insulting” Muslims.

    Well, they’ve got their foot in the door.

    Todd Anthony
    http://www.twincitiesconservative.blogspot.com

  3. Ken Says:

    Britain?

    Do you mean the future Islamic Republic of Anglostan?

    What’s the Arabic word for Judenrien?

Leave a Reply